<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;I am into quality theory.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=i-am-into-quality-theory</link>
	<description>Geert Lovink's blog on the cultural politics of the Internet, media theory and art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowledging across life&#8217;s curriculum &#124; Quality as &#8216;genre&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledging across life&#8217;s curriculum &#124; Quality as &#8216;genre&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/#comment-889</guid>
		<description>[...] Quality as &#8216;genre&#8217; ‘Quality is a genre’ can be said of all media [&#8230;] But quality is another matter all together. It’s a niche, not a value. Goodbye Kant. Unlike what most people believe, quality is not a subjective, let alone objective, attribution that can be attached to a work. It is a genre. You can work in that genre. It is not a special effect of the technology. It is not the result of talent, a genius, or life-long learning. Quality is a way of production, like quality food. “What are you doing?” And then you can say; “I am into quality theory.” (Geert Lovink, of Net Critique) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quality as &#8216;genre&#8217; ‘Quality is a genre’ can be said of all media [&#8230;] But quality is another matter all together. It’s a niche, not a value. Goodbye Kant. Unlike what most people believe, quality is not a subjective, let alone objective, attribution that can be attached to a work. It is a genre. You can work in that genre. It is not a special effect of the technology. It is not the result of talent, a genius, or life-long learning. Quality is a way of production, like quality food. “What are you doing?” And then you can say; “I am into quality theory.” (Geert Lovink, of Net Critique) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gegenglueck &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ausgespielt &#8230; und jetzt?</title>
		<link>http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>gegenglueck &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ausgespielt &#8230; und jetzt?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>[...] Ein bisschen was über Technik gelernt. Schöne, bunten Oberflächen, die Weisheit von XML-Dateien &#8230; Und wenn da nix ist? Immerhin in den letzten Netz-Tagen auf zwei interessante Dinge gestossen: Eine (kurze und dann doch platte) Diskussion über Löschen von Blogbeiträgen bei Paulsen und einem Statement von Geert Lovink zu Qualität als blossem Genre. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ein bisschen was über Technik gelernt. Schöne, bunten Oberflächen, die Weisheit von XML-Dateien &#8230; Und wenn da nix ist? Immerhin in den letzten Netz-Tagen auf zwei interessante Dinge gestossen: Eine (kurze und dann doch platte) Diskussion über Löschen von Blogbeiträgen bei Paulsen und einem Statement von Geert Lovink zu Qualität als blossem Genre. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/03/07/i-am-into-quality-theory/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>I really dig this line of thought. Quality IS a genre! That&#039;s what is good about the possibility to offer and find &#039;First Choice&#039; on todays and tomorrows internet. Let&#039;s see if we can trigger Mathijs to write something on the Goodbye Kant conclusion ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really dig this line of thought. Quality IS a genre! That&#8217;s what is good about the possibility to offer and find &#8216;First Choice&#8217; on todays and tomorrows internet. Let&#8217;s see if we can trigger Mathijs to write something on the Goodbye Kant conclusion <img src='http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

