<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your search &#8211; &#8220;American Abendland&#8221; &#8211; did not match any documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/04/21/your-search-american-abendland-did-not-match-any-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/04/21/your-search-american-abendland-did-not-match-any-documents/</link>
	<description>Geert Lovink's blog on the cultural politics of the Internet, media theory and art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maapa05@yahoo.com</title>
		<link>http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/04/21/your-search-american-abendland-did-not-match-any-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>maapa05@yahoo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 13:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/04/21/your-search-american-abendland-did-not-match-any-documents/#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>Boing Boing, the world’s most popular blog at 1.7 million ‘page reads’ a day (I’m not sure what page reads actually are) has had some highly suspicious post of late. They may infact be ’sponsored posts’ (or posts that are paid for) or posts that are there for some other undeclared financial purpose (or with some sort of financial kickback). I wonder what others think about this? Is the whole site just one big advertisement (including the posts)? I wonder what others think about this? Do you think that ’sponsored posts’ are ethical? (sorry, but I could be wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boing Boing, the world’s most popular blog at 1.7 million ‘page reads’ a day (I’m not sure what page reads actually are) has had some highly suspicious post of late. They may infact be ’sponsored posts’ (or posts that are paid for) or posts that are there for some other undeclared financial purpose (or with some sort of financial kickback). I wonder what others think about this? Is the whole site just one big advertisement (including the posts)? I wonder what others think about this? Do you think that ’sponsored posts’ are ethical? (sorry, but I could be wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Bellamy</title>
		<link>http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/04/21/your-search-american-abendland-did-not-match-any-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Bellamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 10:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/geert/2006/04/21/your-search-american-abendland-did-not-match-any-documents/#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Boing Boing, the world&#039;s most popular blog at 1.7 million &#039;page reads&#039; a day (I&#039;m not sure what page reads actually are) has had some highly suspicious post of late. They may infact be &#039;sponsored posts&#039; (or posts that are paid for) or posts that are there for some other undeclared financial purpose (or with some sort of financial kickback). I wonder what others think about this? Is the whole site just one big advertisement (including the posts)? I wonder what others think about this? Do you think that &#039;sponsored posts&#039; are ethical? (sorry, but I could be wrong?) (Link)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boing Boing, the world&#8217;s most popular blog at 1.7 million &#8216;page reads&#8217; a day (I&#8217;m not sure what page reads actually are) has had some highly suspicious post of late. They may infact be &#8217;sponsored posts&#8217; (or posts that are paid for) or posts that are there for some other undeclared financial purpose (or with some sort of financial kickback). I wonder what others think about this? Is the whole site just one big advertisement (including the posts)? I wonder what others think about this? Do you think that &#8217;sponsored posts&#8217; are ethical? (sorry, but I could be wrong?) (Link)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
