this is a web, woven of symbols.
the symbol ‘>’ indicates a plateau, a “region of intensity”. multiple plateaus form a rhizome, in the same way that multiple nodes form a net.
“any point of a rhizome can be connected to anything other, and must be. this is very different from the tree or root, which plots a point, fixes an order.” (Deleuze & Guattari, Mille Plateaux)
when language is monitored, it can’t breathe. in order to free language, ‘>’ attempts to give centre stage to the totality of a word, to its inherent breath.
‘>’ attempts to deconstruct the language it operates on, and begins with its capitalization.
Kawase Hasui, Benten Pond, 1929.
>click
the universe moves from singularity to chaos, and from chaos to singularity.
beginning in one fixed point, the universe spins strings out of itself. like a muscle, the strings converge at a second point, ‘<>’.
similarly, biological life begins in a singular cell that splits itself, developing structure and complexity. once organisms reach the stage of procreation, two cells create a new singular cell, a new singularity.
given the constant stream of evolution, there is no clearly distinguishable first human. yet, there may be a last human at the end of time.
it would be Atropos, last of the three fates, to cut its thread. the strings connect, then disappear. for a single moment, the cosmos is silent.
you get to choose. two paths entwined like serpents dance, to summon luck, to change the chance.
>eros
“from the bosom of the infinite deeps of Erebus sprang the graceful Eros with his glittering golden wings” (Aristophanes, Birds)
the word eros, from gr. ἔρως, denotes desire and love. eros represents life-drive.
eros can also be interpreted as ‘lack’, or as a desire for ‘that which is missing’. we desire that which is missing, but once we obtain it, we find that the lack is not gone.
we desire desire itself. because we can never achieve it, we repeat the failure of desire. we are desiring machines, designed to keep failing. failing machines become obsolete and die.
eros thus appears to us at once as a drive toward reproduction and as a drive toward self-destruction. it seems to represent our life- drive, but it comes to represent our death-drive. the chariot of eros, ejaculation, is the chariot of thanatos, ‘la petite mort’.
as eros accelerates, its interplay with thanatos speeds up. eros becomes hypereros. this is most visible in digital dating, where the search for beauty is accelerated. the search for beauty is also the search for a lack of ugliness.
digital applications are cybernetic applications to the desiring machine. we apply hypereros to ourselves, only to realize that our death drive is accelerated.
you chose life, eros, but ended in death, thanatos. the choice I had given you was no choice.
you desire choice as long as you don't have it.
>thanatos
from gr. θάνατος, death. in Greek mythology, thanatos is the
personification of death.
in psychoanalysis, thanatos represents our death-drive. for Sigmund Freud, “immortal thanatos is in battle with immortal eros”.
when we connect eros and thanatos semantically, we create a link, a nexus. syntactically, the symbol ‘is’ represents the nexus.
we denote this semantic relationship between the two constituents as ‘<>’, replacing ‘is’.
the constituents point to each other. unidirectionality becomes bi-directionality. the direction of language is reversed, the dot vanishes...
eros <> thanatos
eros and thanatos are linked.
a link is also a split, since a link requires two separate constituents that can be linked. the split between eros and thanatos is our first cutting asunder.
Caravaggio, Narcissus, 1597-1599.
.
but this cut does not divide. we have cut a glass pearl in two, only to realize that one half is mirrored in the other, that the pearl stays whole.
in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, a spirit in a lake shows Narcissus his own reflection. Narcissus sees pure tautology, I=I.
in Hindiusm, the experience of self-identity, “I=I”, translates to the vision of Brahman in the Upanishads, in which the subject realizes that all is Brahman, and that even the soul of the self, Atman, is a reflection of Brahman.
the nymph Echo had fallen in love with Narcissus, but cursed by Hera, she had lost her voice and could only echo his words back.
cursed by Nemesis to undergo the same fate as Echo, and to suffer under unreciprocated love, Narcissus was made to fall in love with his reflection. cursed with eros, he was caught in his own echo.
eros had led him into the water, where thanatos waited for him. at the spot where he fell, a flower was born, the narcissus. Narcissus had lost his name, his capitalization.
“The lake was silent for some time. finally, it said:
I weep for Narcissus, but I never noticed that Narcissus was beautiful. I weep because, each time he knelt beside my banks, I could see, in the depths of his eyes, my own beauty reflected.” (Wilde)
John William Waterhouse, Echo and Narziss, 1903.
.
>union
from lat. unus, one. also, lat. ‘a single pearl’.
to climb this plateau, we have brought together eros and thanatos.
for that purpose, we first separated and defined them. we determined that eros is a force that joins two things together, while thanatos is a force that splits one thing into two. we found that eros is union, and that thanatos is disunion.
having made this distinction, we reconciled eros and thanatos. we made them into reflections of a whole. this is the union of union and disunion.
in his early theological writings, the 19th-century German philosopher G.F.W. Hegel writes, “life cannot be regarded as union or relation alone but must be regarded as opposition as well. [...] I would have to say: life is the union of union and nonunion”.
a similar idea unfolds in Hegel’s first system of thought, his pantheism of love. for Hegel, the essence of love lies in its ability to overcome all differentiation and all contradiction, precisely because love entailed everything.
“What is love? It is not simply compassion, not simply kindness. In compassion there are two: the one who suffers and the one who feels compassion. In kindness there are two: the one who gives and the one who receives. But in love there is only one; the two join, unite, become inseparable. The I and the you vanish. To love means to lose oneself in the beloved.” (Nazantzakis, Saint Francis) .
>energy
the sum of entropic and syntropic energy.
>entropy
entropy represents the tendency from structure to chaos, from order to disorder. ‘entropy’ is a diverging tendency, from en-, “apart”, and trópos “a turn, change”.
entropy signifies the archetypal process of one becoming two, of exponentially drifting apart. it is the gradual decline into disorder that ends in the heat death of the universe. entropy represents thanatos, disunion, and death drive.
the movement of entropy is related to that of the butterfly effect, according to which a single flutter of a butterfly’s wing can raise a typhoon, ‘<’.
in information theory, a system with increasing entropy goes toward higher information. the ‘noise’ of the system increases and is expressed as movement, heat, and noise.
picture a television screen showing a particular image. if one were to subject the image to entropy, the sharp image would disintegrate.
white noise: 0 and 1 in the eternal cosmic dance
.
the second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy count must rise within a closed system. this means that statistically, heat must disperse across the system and lead to a thermodynamic equilibrium.
among others, the thermodynamicist Ilya Prigogine defied this notion, arguing that there can be a spontaneous reversal of entropy.
an entropic field has heightened potential for syntropy. out of entropic chaos, syntropy crystallizes structure.
>syntropy
syntropy is life-drive.
‘syntropy’, from syn-, together, and -trópos, “a turn, a change”, is a coalescing tendency from chaos towards order, complexity, and organization. it can be described as the driving force behind the gradual complexification of consciousness and the unfolding of novelty.
syntropy is a converging tendency, joining two into one. in information theory, a system with higher syntropy goes toward lower information. the symbol of syntropic coalescence is ‘>’.
syntropic systems resist collapse by drawing order from external energy sources, as ecosystems draw from the sun.
systems of language consist of noise, chaos. when a word is added to define an object, information and entropy increase.
also called negative entropy or negentropy, syntropy reduces entropic noise. in the absence of the entropic word, syntropy is silence, inertia.
Hirō Isono: untitled. tristes tropiques…
. ݁
being opposed to entropic heat death, the result of syntropy is a state of cryostasis. as a syntropic system compresses and contracts, its temperature decreases.
this movement is related to the ‘big crunch’ hypothesis, according to which the universe collapses upon itself after an initial ‘big bang’ stage.
if the study of entropy-regulated systems is called thermodynamics (from gr. thermós, hot), the study of syntropy-regulated systems may be called “cryodynamics” (from gr. krúos, ice).
as the temperature of a syntropic system decreases, it crystallizes. a singular iceflower blooms, containing the compressed universe.
the iceflower represents the fragility and transience of syntropic structures. this metaphor applies to the entropy/syntropy relation on the level of social systems.
in one of his last works titled The Neganthropocene, Bernard Stiegler imagines a hypothetical age of syntropy in which entropy is reversed.
syntropic techniques, for Stiegler, are techniques to reverse the destructive entropy of our current age, the ‘Entropocene’, which is characterized by ever-accelerating social and environmental issues.
in Escaping the Anthropocene, he writes,
“The Anthropocene is an ‘Entropocene’, that is, a period in which entropy is produced on a massive scale. (...) The Anthropocene is unsustainable: it is a massive and high-speed process of destruction operating on a planetary scale, and its current direction must be reversed. The question and the challenge of the Anthropocene is therefore the ‘Neganthropocene’.”
(Stiegler, 2015).
in the vedic canon, the universe undergoes perpetual cycles of creation and destruction. this pulse of the universe is visualized in the cosmic dance of Shiva.
<><><><><><><><>
butterfly, caught in a dream...
>eschaton
from gr. éskhaton, the ‘last thing’.
eschaton is the end. every web must end, every string dissolve.
eschaton is not the end of this story, since every ending is a beginning. having reached the last thing, eschaton, we have also found the first thing, proton.
a link into the past. the line bends, the serpent bites its tail.
text becomes hypertext.
>cyberspace
the first hypertext project came into existence in 1960. it was the seminal Project Xanadu, in which Ted Nelson attempted to create an infinitely large digital library.
infinite, because this library would have a built-in system of reference: documents would have links that would refer the reader to a different document. Nelson proposed the term hypertext in 1965.
in 1989, Tim Berners-Lee developed the World Wide Web (W3) while working at CERN. it was a global system of pages accessed via HTTP, ‘hypertext transfer protocols’. this was its first page: https://info.cern.ch/.
it is important to note that the early implementations of hypertext relied on ideas that were inherited and reinterpreted. one early point of reference was Jorge Luis Borges’ Garden of Forking Paths, written in 1941, which explored the possibility of an infinitely branching and converging labyrinth of symbols. a second point of reference was the short essay As We May Think, written in 1945 by Vannevar Bush.
in As We May Think, Bush describes a potential future society in which information is stored in memory machines, which he called the memex (memory-extension). this anticipated the emergence of complex cybernetic devices by decades.
a plateau is precisely a memex, an “enlarged intimate supplement to the memory”. it functions as a cybernetic implant: an external data module is intimately linked to the mind. plateaus are neurological prostheses to the cyborg self: subject and media mold each other in feedback loops.
in 1980, Deleuze and Guattari published A Thousand Plateaus, further laying the philosophical foundation for the internet. they proposed the ‘rhizome’, an underground system of stems, without beginnings or endings, in which every point, or plateau, could be connected to every other point.
in the tradition of Buddhism and Hinduism, the equivalent to a non-linear rhizome would be the concept of Indra's net, an infinitely large net that reflects itself in every point.
hypertext mirrors the structure of the human mind. if the mind is a web of synaptic connections, a plateau represents a single point in Indra’s mind.
>amnesis
gedankenverloren
the loss of memory. from a-, ‘not’, and gr. mneme ‘memory’.
amnesis, forgetting, is the counterprinciple to anamnesis, remembering. anamnesis is the gaining back of memory.
in Platonism, anamnesis is the process of remembering the idea of beauty. in the allegory of the cave, we hear the story of a person that comes into contact with the sun after spending their whole life chained in a cave, mistaking the shadows on the walls for reality. in eastern traditions of philosophy, the shadows are described as maya, illusion, dream.
for Plato, there existed a layer of reality beyond the physical reality. he described it as the ‘world soul’, from which souls would emerge and return to. while the idea of beauty was inherently known within the world soul, a soul would forget it at birth. yet, it could be remembered during life, ‘re-cognized’.
amnesis means forgetting the idea of beauty. in amnesis, our memories return to the world soul. in death, the neuronal complex (from com- ‘together’ and -plex ‘woven’) unwinds itself.
amnesis is the entropic process of synaptic breakdown. anamnesis, on the other hand, may be the syntropic process of synaptic genesis. in life, the neuronal complex weaves itself.
if all learning is remembering, you are remembering the web, for you are its weaver.
>anamnesis
Kushu, digital collage, 2024.
.
the entropic desert expands. ecological structures are disintegrated by entropic processes like desertification, which render large masses of land useless for agriculture.
entropy also affects the psyche. if entropy and information increase while neurological capacity stays the same, more neuronal structures must be discarded of.
nonetheless, a state of pure entropy may not be unavoidable. the second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy count within a closed system must rise. the earth, however, is not a closed system.
as an open system, the earth receives entropic energy from the sun, which gives life to all biological, syntropic processes. our ability to draw out syntropy may determine whether or not our current systems will pervail.
materially, we may increase syntropy through extensive reforestation. psychologically, we may develop ways of retaining and protecting memory. this could be called ‘psychological reforestation’.
>tree
in computer science, a tree is a hierarchical and linear data structure that contains a set of interlinked nodes.
the structure “>web” has tree-like features. it follows a linear path that begins in a root node, namely “>web”. it progresses linearly, through arborescent thinking, branching on and on.
yet, “>web” develops a non-linear narrative. it follows Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizomatic thinking, in which a set of plateaus are connected non-linearly and form a rhizome.
as a result, a tree is not a sufficient description of the web. the web is not a single tree. rather, each plateau symbolizes a tree, standing amidst other trees.
a forest is defined as a set of disjoint trees. since the web contains a set of plateaus, disjoint trees, the web is a forest, a syntropic rhizome.
der wald träumt einen tiefen traum.
Hirō Isono: Secret of Mana (1993).
.
the end is not the only bloom.
if the end is a seed, we find a bloom in the beginning.
“A special button transfers him immediately to the first page of the index.”
(Vannevar Bush, As We May Think)
>index
>click
>eros
>thanatos
>union
>energy
>entropy
>syntropy
>eschaton
>web
>cyberspace
>amnesis
>anamnesis
>tree
>seed
Leon Magalhaes Schoyerer (*2000 in Rio de Janeiro) is a writer and independent researcher based in Berlin. He studied Philosophy at Humboldt University of Berlin and Social Sciences at Amsterdam University College. His research traces links between metaphysics, systems theory, and mythology.