A few of us are currently in preparation for the “Commoning the Network: Feminist Methodologies” (CN:FM) project Transmediale 2015.
The people involved in this presentation are discussing and debating on the ‘commons’, a concept that has gained traction in recent debates on online culture, expanding this to cultural production in terms of feminist commons. The commonly understood or ‘original’ definition, the term ‘commons’ refers to land that is open for collective use. In contemporary debates the ‘commons’ is more often used in reference to spaces and practices that are shared by groups aiming to question traditional ownership and in this particular case, – that of feminist methodologies as applied to technology – the focus is to forge an existence outside a common user/system administrator relation.
Comparisons are being made between servers which work in the traditional manner and feminist servers, which may affirmatively deconstruct services which are provided by traditional (or commercial) servers, for example, unpacking the difference between user services in terms of encryption how people sign away their freedoms. Exploring possible ways of archiving information and controlling ones data is of prime importance.
How could this be implemented in practical terms and how could feminist approaches to technology facilitate this aim? Which are the techniques, technologies, language requirements and relevant methodologies to make this possible?
The CN:FM sessions is a part of the commons programme in the foyer space of House of World Cultures at Transmediale 2015, a continuation from a CIRCLE event in September 2014. In which discussions started with networks and commons, and how feminist approaches can facilitate these concepts, in which Feminist sys-admin servers: systerserver.net, miss-hack.org and others were introduced. There is a core group who have been in discussion consisting of: Penny Travlou, Sophia Lycourious, Daphne Dragona, Helen Varley Jamieson, Cornelia Solfrank, Donna Metlzar, Reni Hofmüller, Nancy Mauro-Flude.
Inspirational 90s vintage ‘still in circulation’ sticker by Rosie Cross, aka RosieX | geekgirl
image of JEAN – server rack of SysterServer.net
2) hands on ‘workshop’ – what kinds of TOS might we want to have for a feminist server?
3) wrap up presentation
What are the differences between feminist approaches to security and privacy?
Working with virtual and remote servers, technically and conceptually, the idea of the feminist sys admin server has been used in discussions about forms of organisation and collaborative work. These conceptual/critical issues are brought forth, this differentiation is first performed instead of demonstrated, as a corollary for more technologically orientated issues. By making comparisons between servers which work in the traditional manner and feminist servers may affirmatively deconstruct services which are provided by traditional (or commercial) servers, for example, unpacking the difference between user services in terms of encryption how people sign away their freedoms.